Is Cotton the Sustainable Future? Discover Why It’s a Game-Changer

Is Cotton the Sustainable Future? Discover Why It’s a Game-Changer

Cotton is a natural, biodegradable fiber that has been around for centuries, but with the rise of more eco-conscious industries looking for greener alternatives to synthetic fibers like polyester and nylon, the question of whether cotton is sustainable is being debated. Synthetics have gained popularity because they are durable and long-lasting, but cotton is still growing strong. In fact, the cotton industry is projected to grow from a market value of $43.96 billion in 2024 to $50.2 billion by 2029. The U.S. is a major player in the cotton industry, producing around 12 million bales of cotton each year. While cotton is mainly used for apparel and textiles, it’s also found in other industries, including cooking, soap-making, furniture, and cosmetics. As concerns about sustainability and reducing carbon emissions rise, industries are moving away from non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton has a long history in the textile industry, with the first seed believed to have been planted in Florida in 1556. But, with the invention of materials like nylon, polyester, and spandex in the mid-20th century, synthetics became more popular. While synthetics are durable, they are now under scrutiny due to microplastic pollution and their reliance on petroleum. So, even though cotton is getting more attention as a sustainable option, its sustainability is still questioned, particularly regarding water use and the chemicals involved in farming. Despite these challenges, many industries are leaning into cotton as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to synthetics, especially to meet the demand of eco-conscious consumers.

The Cotton Controversy

One of the most cited concerns about cotton farming is how much water it uses. It’s often claimed that producing a single pair of jeans requires 20,000 liters of water—this number came from a 1999 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) report. However, this statistic was later debunked because no original source could be found, and updated studies have reported much lower estimates. For example, the UN Environment Program revised the estimate to 3,781 liters per kilogram of cotton, which is closer to the amount needed for a pair of jeans. But, the actual water consumption depends heavily on where the cotton is grown. In places like the southeastern U.S., cotton farms may only need around 234 liters of water per kilogram, while farms in the southwest use around 3,272 liters. The difference mostly comes down to whether the farm relies on rainwater or irrigation.

Biodegradability

One of cotton’s biggest selling points is its biodegradability. Unlike polyester, which takes 20 to 200 years to break down, cotton decomposes in just one to six months. Cotton also plays a role in addressing the growing microplastic pollution problem. In 2004, researchers discovered that synthetic fibers—especially from textiles—were accumulating in the oceans, contributing to microplastic pollution. These fibers are released when clothes are washed and can end up in the air, water, and even our food. While measures like special filters in washing machines and treatment plants are being used, it’s hard to prevent the release of these fibers entirely. Cotton is a better alternative since it doesn’t contribute to the microplastic issue as much, even though cotton fabrics can shed microfibers too. The difference is that cotton fibers break down much faster and don’t leave harmful plastic remnants. Cotton’s biodegradability also means it can be composted instead of being sent to landfills. In a study by Cornell University, cotton fabric broke down 77% after just 90 days in compost, whereas synthetic materials barely degraded. Composting cotton also helps enrich the soil, which contributes to carbon sequestration, as it returns carbon to the earth instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. This is important because the vast majority of textiles—around 75%—end up in landfills, releasing harmful gases like methane, which is much more dangerous to the climate than carbon dioxide. Textiles made from synthetics, especially, also release hazardous chemicals into the soil.

The Impact of Drought on Cotton Plants

Some of the concerns about cotton’s sustainability revolve around its water needs, particularly as climate change leads to more frequent droughts. It’s estimated that 56% of the global cotton crop depends on rainwater, and many worry that this will lead to lower yields as droughts become more common. However, cotton plants are actually fairly drought-resistant. They can grow deep root systems, adapt their cells, and reduce their photosynthetic rate to survive. Research is also focusing on identifying drought-resistant cotton varieties, so farms can plant these hardier crops to maintain or even boost yields despite worsening drought conditions. It’s also worth noting that cotton doesn’t require more water than other crops like wheat, maize, and rice. In the U.S., cotton farms use just 3.8% of all irrigated land, and about half of these farms rely solely on rainwater. Water usage varies depending on the farming practices used—methods like furrow irrigation are only 60% efficient, while sprinkler and drip irrigation are far more effective at using water. Optimizing irrigation systems can help cotton farms use less water, which is a priority for sustainable farming.

Fertilizers: How Bad Are They?

Fertilizers are another area of concern for cotton farming. According to the USDA, a large percentage of cotton farms use synthetic fertilizers—86% use nitrogen, 61% use phosphate, and 48% use potassium. Fertilizers are energy-intensive to produce, requiring fossil fuels that release carbon emissions. They also disrupt the soil’s natural balance, killing beneficial microbes that are essential for healthy farming in the long term. Overuse of fertilizers can also release nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas. One of the biggest contributors to cotton’s carbon footprint is the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which accounts for nearly half of the emissions related to cotton farming. However, some farms are trying to reduce their environmental impact by switching to natural fertilizers made from plant materials, animal by-products, and minerals. Though these alternatives are harder to implement and more expensive, they offer a way to make cotton farming more sustainable in the future.

Pesticides and Herbicides

Pesticides and herbicides are commonly used on cotton farms, but their environmental impact has been a point of concern. While outdated reports still claim that cotton uses 25% of all pesticides and insecticides globally, newer estimates show that cotton actually accounts for just 4.61% of pesticide use and 10.24% of insecticide use. Despite these lower figures, pesticides are still widely used in cotton farming. A 2019 USDA study found that 93% of U.S. cotton fields were treated with herbicides, and 53% were treated with insecticides. The problem with these chemicals is that they can pollute water sources and harm aquatic life, and they pose health risks to farmers and nearby communities. However, alternatives to these chemicals do exist. Organic cotton farming has been on the rise, and this approach uses natural methods to manage pests and encourage healthy crops. Organic farming practices like crop rotation—alternating different crops to reduce pests—can help keep the soil healthy and reduce the need for chemicals. Although organic cotton farming can be more difficult and labor-intensive, it’s a promising alternative to conventional farming methods. In 2019, only 0.2% of U.S. cotton was grown organically, but this percentage is steadily increasing.

Organic Cotton Farming: A Sustainable Option

The growth of organic cotton farming is part of a broader movement toward more sustainable agricultural practices. Organic cotton farming avoids synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and instead uses natural methods like crop rotation, companion planting, and natural pesticides. While it’s more challenging, organic farming preserves biodiversity and reduces the environmental impact of cotton cultivation. However, organic cotton still represents a small portion of total cotton production, so its adoption needs to increase to make a significant difference.

Biodegradable Alternatives: Cotton vs. Jute and Flax

Because of cotton’s reputation for being water-intensive, some are turning to other biodegradable alternatives like jute and flax. Jute, made from the bark of the jute tree, is cheaper than cotton and biodegradable but has a rough texture and doesn’t hold up well when washed, which limits its use in textiles. Flax, also biodegradable, is softer than cotton but more expensive and labor-intensive to grow. Despite its environmental benefits, flax is seen as a luxury product, which makes it less accessible for mass production. Cotton still holds the advantage due to its lower cost, durability, and versatility. In fact, recent research has even explored blending cotton with jute to create a fiber called “jutton,” which combines the benefits of both materials.

Improving Cotton's Environmental Footprint

In addition to organic farming practices and drought-resistant varieties, the cotton industry has been exploring other ways to improve its environmental footprint. One important approach is the implementation of precision agriculture techniques, which use data-driven technologies to optimize water and nutrient use. These techniques involve the use of sensors, drones, and satellite imagery to monitor soil conditions, weather patterns, and crop health in real time. By accurately measuring the needs of the cotton plants, farmers can reduce waste, improve yield, and use fewer resources, which leads to a reduction in environmental impacts.

Furthermore, there is increasing interest in regenerative agriculture practices, which focus on restoring soil health and biodiversity. These methods go beyond organic farming by aiming to regenerate ecosystems, sequester carbon in the soil, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By emphasizing practices like cover cropping, agroforestry, and reduced tillage, regenerative agriculture can help cotton farms become carbon-negative, turning them into net carbon sinks rather than carbon emitters.

The role of cotton in the circular economy is another area of focus. The circular economy emphasizes reducing waste, reusing materials, and recycling products at the end of their lifecycle. For cotton, this could mean creating systems where cotton fibers are recycled from old textiles and reprocessed into new products, minimizing the need for virgin cotton and reducing the amount of textile waste that ends up in landfills. Several companies are already experimenting with cotton recycling technologies, and if scaled, this could significantly reduce the overall environmental impact of cotton textiles.

The Role of Innovation and Consumer Demand

Innovation also plays a crucial role in the future of cotton’s sustainability. New technologies in the textile industry, such as waterless dyeing techniques and the use of eco-friendly chemicals in fabric treatments, could reduce the environmental impact of cotton fabric processing. These innovations, paired with sustainable cotton farming practices, could help create a more sustainable cotton supply chain from farm to finished product.

Additionally, consumer demand for sustainable products has been a driving force behind these changes. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, brands are increasingly being pressured to adopt sustainable practices in their supply chains. Cotton producers who adopt organic or regenerative farming methods, and companies that use cotton-based materials in eco-friendly products, are benefiting from this shift in consumer preferences. As demand for sustainably sourced cotton grows, it creates a ripple effect across the industry, encouraging more farmers to adopt sustainable practices.

Cotton in Nonwovens: A Growing Trend

Cotton is increasingly being used in nonwovens, a type of fabric made by bonding fibers together using chemical, mechanical, or heat treatments. Nonwovens are commonly used in disposable products like wipes, diapers, and medical dressings. Since nonwoven products are often single-use and end up in landfills, many manufacturers are looking for biodegradable alternatives. Cotton is a promising option for nonwovens, and its use is steadily growing. While cotton still makes up a small portion of the nonwoven market, its potential for replacing synthetic fibers in disposable products is significant. The USDA is also working on ways to improve the sustainability of cotton-based nonwovens.

The Economic Viability of Sustainable Cotton

While sustainability is important, economic viability is also a crucial factor in ensuring the long-term success of cotton farming. Transitioning to organic or regenerative farming practices often requires significant upfront investments in terms of time, labor, and resources. For many small cotton farmers, these practices may initially seem costly, but they can provide long-term benefits by improving soil health, increasing yields, and reducing the dependency on synthetic chemicals, which may become more expensive or regulated in the future.

To support this transition, policy initiatives and government incentives can play an important role. In some countries, subsidies or grants are available to farmers who implement sustainable farming practices, which can help offset the initial costs of transitioning to organic or regenerative cotton farming. Additionally, international certification programs, such as the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) or the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), can provide farmers with access to premium markets where sustainable cotton is in high demand, offering economic incentives for sustainable practices.

The Global Cotton Landscape and Future Outlook

Looking at the global cotton landscape, it’s clear that cotton farming will continue to evolve. While challenges like water consumption, pesticide use, and climate change impacts persist, there are promising developments that can help mitigate these challenges. The integration of sustainable cotton practices is not just a trend but a necessary shift to ensure that cotton remains a viable and environmentally friendly option in the face of growing concerns about synthetic fibers and their environmental impact.

Countries like India and China, the two largest cotton producers, are also exploring ways to make cotton farming more sustainable. Efforts to reduce pesticide use, enhance water management, and support smallholder farmers are underway. As cotton-producing regions across the world adopt more sustainable practices, the overall global impact of cotton farming will continue to improve.

The future of cotton lies in balancing its economic value with its environmental sustainability. Through continued innovation, improved farming practices, and a shift toward circular economies, cotton can continue to be a major player in the global textile industry while minimizing its environmental footprint. It’s clear that sustainable cotton is not just possible—it is an essential component of a more sustainable future for the textile industry.

Conclusion: Cotton’s Path Forward

The debate about cotton’s sustainability highlights the complexities of balancing environmental impact with practicality and economic viability. Despite challenges like water use, fertilizers, and pesticides, cotton remains a strong contender as a more sustainable option compared to non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton’s biodegradability, potential for organic farming, and adaptability to climate change through drought-resistant varieties make it a promising alternative. By optimizing farming practices and reducing reliance on harmful chemicals, cotton can continue to be a sustainable solution for industries looking to move away from synthetics.

In conclusion, the question of whether cotton is sustainable depends on how it is produced, processed, and disposed of. Cotton, with its natural biodegradability, offers clear advantages over synthetic fibers, particularly in terms of reducing microplastic pollution and promoting a circular economy. However, challenges such as water use, pesticide application, and fertilizer dependency need to be addressed to ensure cotton’s sustainability in the long run.

By adopting sustainable farming practices, leveraging technological innovations, and encouraging responsible consumption, cotton can meet the demand for eco-friendly materials while minimizing its environmental impact. The growing interest in organic and regenerative cotton farming, along with advancements in cotton recycling, suggests that the cotton industry has a bright future in terms of sustainability. Ultimately, the shift towards sustainable cotton is not just an industry-wide effort but also one that involves consumers, farmers, and policymakers working together toward a more sustainable and circular future.


References

Bednarz, C., Ritchie, G., Hook, J., Yager, R., 2004. Cotton Crop Water Use and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conference.

Çelik, S., 2023. Assessing Drought Tolerance in a Large Number of Upland Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Different Irrigation Regimes at the Seedling Stage. Life 13, 2067. Life

Daria, M., Krzysztof, L., Jakub, M., 2020. Characteristics of biodegradable textiles used in environmental engineering: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production 268, 122129. Journal of Cleaner Production

European Environment Agency, 2024. Microplastics from textiles: towards a circular economy for textiles in Europe. European Environment Agency (accessed 11.19.24).

Geng, S., Gao, W., Li, S., Chen, Qin, Jiao, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Qu, Y., Chen, Quanjia, 2024. Rapidly mining candidate cotton drought resistance genes based on key indicators of drought resistance. BMC Plant Biol 24, 129. BMC Plant Biology

Grubinger, V., n.d. Sources of Nitrogen for Organic Farms. University of Vermont. University of Vermont (accessed 11.21.24).

Hasan, S.T., Alam, M.M., Sabil, R.S., Bari, M.S., 2020. A complete comparison between JUTTON & COTTON-increase jute dependency instead of cotton. JTEFT 6. JTEFT

Hedayati, M., Brock, P.M., Nachimuthu, G., Schwenke, G., 2019. Farm-level strategies to reduce the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cotton production: An Australian perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 212, 974–985. Journal of Cleaner Production

Herculite, 2023. Complete Guide to Synthetic Fabrics. Herculite (accessed 11.21.24).

Ho, T.T.K., Tra, V.T., Le, T.H., Nguyen, N.-K.-Q., Tran, C.-S., Nguyen, P.-T., Vo, T.-D.-H., Thai, V.-N., Bui, X.-T., 2022. Compost to improve sustainable soil cultivation and crop productivity. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 6, 100211. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering

International Cotton Advisory Committee, 2018. The Final Statement of the 77th Plenary Meeting. International Cotton Advisory Committee (accessed 11.19.24).

Iowa State University, n.d. Flax. Iowa State University (accessed 11.19.24).

Jamir, M.R.M., Majid, M.S.A., Khasri, A., 2018. Natural lightweight hybrid composites for aircraft structural applications, in: Sustainable Composites for Aerospace Applications. Elsevier, pp. 155–170. Elsevier

Juanga-Labayen, J.P., Labayen, I.V., Yuan, Q., 2022. A Review on Textile Recycling Practices and Challenges. Textiles 2, 174–188. Textiles

Koussé, J.N.D., Ilboudo, S., Ouédraogo, J.C.R.P., Hunsmann, M., Ouédraogo, G.G., Ouédraogo, M., Kini, F.B., Ouédraogo, S., 2023. Self-reported health effects of pesticides among cotton farmers from the Central-West region in Burkina Faso. Toxicology Reports 11, 273–282. Toxicology Reports

Leal Filho, W., Perry, P., Heim, H., Dinis, M.A.P., Moda, H., Ebhuoma, E., Paço, A., 2022. An overview of the contribution of the textiles sector to climate change. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 973102. Frontiers in Environmental Science

Li, L., Frey, M., Browning, K.J., 2010. Biodegradability Study on Cotton and Polyester Fabrics. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 5, 155892501000500406. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics

Manteco, 2024. Biodegradability in Fashion. Manteco (accessed 11.4.24).

Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2011. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 1577–1600. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Mordor Intelligence, 2024. Cotton Market Size and Share Analysis. Mordor Intelligence (accessed 11.18.24).

National Cotton Council of America, 2024a. Economics of Cotton. National Cotton Council of America (accessed 11.19.24).

National Cotton Council of America, 2024b. The Story of Cotton. National Cotton Council of America (accessed 11.21.24).

National Wildlife Federation, n.d. Cotton and Pesticides. National Wildlife Federation (accessed 11.20.24).

Organic Trade Association, 2022. Get the facts about Organic Cotton. Organic Trade Association (accessed 11.18.24).

Radhakrishnan, S., 2017. Sustainable cotton production, in: Sustainable Fibres and Textiles. Elsevier, pp. 21–67. Elsevier

Rodale Institute, 2024. Pest Management. Rodale Institute (accessed 11.18.24).

Stavropoulos, P., Mavroeidis, A., Papadopoulos, G., Roussis, I., Bilalis, D., Kakabouki, I., 2023. On the Path towards a “Greener” EU: A Mini Review on Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) as a Case Study. Plants 12, 1102. Plants

Taghvaeian, S., 2017. Surface Irrigation Systems. Oklahoma State University (accessed 11.18.24).

Thompson, R.C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R.P., Davis, A., Rowland, S.J., John, A.W.G., McGonigle, D., Russell, A.E., 2004. Lost at Sea: Where Is All the Plastic? Science 304, 838–838. Science

Transformers Foundation, 2021. Cotton: A Case Study in Misinformation. Transformers Foundation (accessed 11.18.24).

Ullah, A., Sun, H., Yang, X., Zhang, X., 2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 271–284. Plant Biotechnology Journal

UN Environment Programme, 2018. Cleaning up couture: what’s in your jeans? UN Environment Programme (accessed 11.20.24).

UN Environment Programme, n.d. What’s the deal with methane? UN Environment Programme

United Nations, 2024. Greenwashing – the deceptive tactics behind environmental claims. Climate Action. United Nations (accessed 11.4.24).

US Environmental Protection Agency, 2020. What You Should Know About Microfiber Pollution. US Environmental Protection Agency (accessed 11.18.24).

USDA, 2024a. Cotton Fiber Bioscience & Utilization Research. USDA (accessed 11.19.24).

USDA, 2024b. Improving the Sustainability and Value of Cotton’s Natural Fibers. USDA (accessed 11.19.24).

USDA, 2024c. Production – Cotton. USDA (accessed 11.21.24).

USDA, 2023. 2023 Irrigation and Water Management Survey. USDA (accessed 11.20.24).

USDA, 2022. Cotton Sector at a Glance. USDA (accessed 11.21.24).

USDA, 2020. 2019 Agricultural Chemical Use Survey – Cotton. USDA (accessed 11.18.24).

USGS, 2024. Droughts and Climate Change. USGS (accessed 11.20.24).

Zambrano, M.C., Pawlak, J.J., Daystar, J., Ankeny, M., Cheng, J.J., Venditti, R.A., 2019. Microfibers generated from the laundering of cotton, rayon and polyester based fabrics and their aquatic biodegradation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 142, 394–407. Marine Pollution Bulletin

Zhang, Z., Huang, J., Yao, Y., Peters, G., Macdonald, B., La Rosa, A.D., Wang, Z., Scherer, L., 2023. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 703–715. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

Back to blog