Greenwashing Diapers: Are “Eco-Friendly” Diapers Just a Scam?
October 10, 2024
No Comments
Read More »
Cotton: Is It Sustainable?
Is Cotton the Sustainable Future? Discover Why It’s a Game-Changer
Cotton is a natural, biodegradable fiber that has been around for centuries, but with the rise of more eco-conscious industries looking for greener alternatives to synthetic fibers like polyester and nylon, the question of whether cotton is sustainable is being debated. Synthetics have gained popularity because they are durable and long-lasting, but cotton is still growing strong. In fact, the cotton industry is projected to grow from a market value of $43.96 billion in 2024 to $50.2 billion by 2029. The U.S. is a major player in the cotton industry, producing around 12 million bales of cotton each year. While cotton is mainly used for apparel and textiles, it’s also found in other industries, including cooking, soap-making, furniture, and cosmetics.
As concerns about sustainability and reducing carbon emissions rise, industries are moving away from non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton has a long history in the textile industry, with the first seed believed to have been planted in Florida in 1556. But, with the invention of materials like nylon, polyester, and spandex in the mid-20th century, synthetics became more popular. While synthetics are durable, they are now under scrutiny due to microplastic pollution and their reliance on petroleum. So, even though cotton is getting more attention as a sustainable option, its sustainability is still questioned, particularly regarding water use and the chemicals involved in farming. Despite these challenges, many industries are leaning into cotton as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to synthetics, especially to meet the demand of eco-conscious consumers.
The Cotton Controversy
One of the most cited concerns about cotton farming is how much water it uses. It’s often claimed that producing a single pair of jeans requires 20,000 liters of water—this number came from a 1999 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) report. However, this statistic was later debunked because no original source could be found, and updated studies have reported much lower estimates. For example, the UN Environment Program revised the estimate to 3,781 liters per kilogram of cotton, which is closer to the amount needed for a pair of jeans. But, the actual water consumption depends heavily on where the cotton is grown. In places like the southeastern U.S., cotton farms may only need around 234 liters of water per kilogram, while farms in the southwest use around 3,272 liters. The difference mostly comes down to whether the farm relies on rainwater or irrigation.Biodegradability
One of cotton’s biggest selling points is its biodegradability. Unlike polyester, which takes 20 to 200 years to break down, cotton decomposes in just one to six months. Cotton also plays a role in addressing the growing microplastic pollution problem. In 2004, researchers discovered that synthetic fibers—especially from textiles—were accumulating in the oceans, contributing to microplastic pollution. These fibers are released when clothes are washed and can end up in the air, water, and even our food. While measures like special filters in washing machines and treatment plants are being used, it’s hard to prevent the release of these fibers entirely. Cotton is a better alternative since it doesn’t contribute to the microplastic issue as much, even though cotton fabrics can shed microfibers too. The difference is that cotton fibers break down much faster and don’t leave harmful plastic remnants. Cotton’s biodegradability also means it can be composted instead of being sent to landfills. In a study by Cornell University, cotton fabric broke down 77% after just 90 days in compost, whereas synthetic materials barely degraded. Composting cotton also helps enrich the soil, which contributes to carbon sequestration, as it returns carbon to the earth instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. This is important because the vast majority of textiles—around 75%—end up in landfills, releasing harmful gases like methane, which is much more dangerous to the climate than carbon dioxide. Textiles made from synthetics, especially, also release hazardous chemicals into the soil.The Impact of Drought on Cotton Plants
Some of the concerns about cotton’s sustainability revolve around its water needs, particularly as climate change leads to more frequent droughts. It’s estimated that 56% of the global cotton crop depends on rainwater, and many worry that this will lead to lower yields as droughts become more common. However, cotton plants are actually fairly drought-resistant. They can grow deep root systems, adapt their cells, and reduce their photosynthetic rate to survive. Research is also focusing on identifying drought-resistant cotton varieties, so farms can plant these hardier crops to maintain or even boost yields despite worsening drought conditions. It’s also worth noting that cotton doesn’t require more water than other crops like wheat, maize, and rice. In the U.S., cotton farms use just 3.8% of all irrigated land, and about half of these farms rely solely on rainwater. Water usage varies depending on the farming practices used—methods like furrow irrigation are only 60% efficient, while sprinkler and drip irrigation are far more effective at using water. Optimizing irrigation systems can help cotton farms use less water, which is a priority for sustainable farming.Fertilizers: How Bad Are They?
Fertilizers are another area of concern for cotton farming. According to the USDA, a large percentage of cotton farms use synthetic fertilizers—86% use nitrogen, 61% use phosphate, and 48% use potassium. Fertilizers are energy-intensive to produce, requiring fossil fuels that release carbon emissions. They also disrupt the soil’s natural balance, killing beneficial microbes that are essential for healthy farming in the long term. Overuse of fertilizers can also release nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas. One of the biggest contributors to cotton’s carbon footprint is the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which accounts for nearly half of the emissions related to cotton farming. However, some farms are trying to reduce their environmental impact by switching to natural fertilizers made from plant materials, animal by-products, and minerals. Though these alternatives are harder to implement and more expensive, they offer a way to make cotton farming more sustainable in the future.Pesticides and Herbicides
Pesticides and herbicides are commonly used on cotton farms, but their environmental impact has been a point of concern. While outdated reports still claim that cotton uses 25% of all pesticides and insecticides globally, newer estimates show that cotton actually accounts for just 4.61% of pesticide use and 10.24% of insecticide use. Despite these lower figures, pesticides are still widely used in cotton farming. A 2019 USDA study found that 93% of U.S. cotton fields were treated with herbicides, and 53% were treated with insecticides. The problem with these chemicals is that they can pollute water sources and harm aquatic life, and they pose health risks to farmers and nearby communities. However, alternatives to these chemicals do exist. Organic cotton farming has been on the rise, and this approach uses natural methods to manage pests and encourage healthy crops. Organic farming practices like crop rotation—alternating different crops to reduce pests—can help keep the soil healthy and reduce the need for chemicals. Although organic cotton farming can be more difficult and labor-intensive, it’s a promising alternative to conventional farming methods. In 2019, only 0.2% of U.S. cotton was grown organically, but this percentage is steadily increasing.Organic Cotton Farming: A Sustainable Option
The growth of organic cotton farming is part of a broader movement toward more sustainable agricultural practices. Organic cotton farming avoids synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and instead uses natural methods like crop rotation, companion planting, and natural pesticides. While it’s more challenging, organic farming preserves biodiversity and reduces the environmental impact of cotton cultivation. However, organic cotton still represents a small portion of total cotton production, so its adoption needs to increase to make a significant difference.Biodegradable Alternatives: Cotton vs. Jute and Flax
Because of cotton’s reputation for being water-intensive, some are turning to other biodegradable alternatives like jute and flax. Jute, made from the bark of the jute tree, is cheaper than cotton and biodegradable but has a rough texture and doesn’t hold up well when washed, which limits its use in textiles. Flax, also biodegradable, is softer than cotton but more expensive and labor-intensive to grow. Despite its environmental benefits, flax is seen as a luxury product, which makes it less accessible for mass production. Cotton still holds the advantage due to its lower cost, durability, and versatility. In fact, recent research has even explored blending cotton with jute to create a fiber called “jutton,” which combines the benefits of both materials.Improving Cotton's Environmental Footprint
In addition to organic farming practices and drought-resistant varieties, the cotton industry has been exploring other ways to improve its environmental footprint. One important approach is the implementation of precision agriculture techniques, which use data-driven technologies to optimize water and nutrient use. These techniques involve the use of sensors, drones, and satellite imagery to monitor soil conditions, weather patterns, and crop health in real time. By accurately measuring the needs of the cotton plants, farmers can reduce waste, improve yield, and use fewer resources, which leads to a reduction in environmental impacts.
Furthermore, there is increasing interest in regenerative agriculture practices, which focus on restoring soil health and biodiversity. These methods go beyond organic farming by aiming to regenerate ecosystems, sequester carbon in the soil, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By emphasizing practices like cover cropping, agroforestry, and reduced tillage, regenerative agriculture can help cotton farms become carbon-negative, turning them into net carbon sinks rather than carbon emitters.
The role of cotton in the circular economy is another area of focus. The circular economy emphasizes reducing waste, reusing materials, and recycling products at the end of their lifecycle. For cotton, this could mean creating systems where cotton fibers are recycled from old textiles and reprocessed into new products, minimizing the need for virgin cotton and reducing the amount of textile waste that ends up in landfills. Several companies are already experimenting with cotton recycling technologies, and if scaled, this could significantly reduce the overall environmental impact of cotton textiles.
The Role of Innovation and Consumer Demand
Innovation also plays a crucial role in the future of cotton’s sustainability. New technologies in the textile industry, such as waterless dyeing techniques and the use of eco-friendly chemicals in fabric treatments, could reduce the environmental impact of cotton fabric processing. These innovations, paired with sustainable cotton farming practices, could help create a more sustainable cotton supply chain from farm to finished product.
Additionally, consumer demand for sustainable products has been a driving force behind these changes. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, brands are increasingly being pressured to adopt sustainable practices in their supply chains. Cotton producers who adopt organic or regenerative farming methods, and companies that use cotton-based materials in eco-friendly products, are benefiting from this shift in consumer preferences. As demand for sustainably sourced cotton grows, it creates a ripple effect across the industry, encouraging more farmers to adopt sustainable practices.
Cotton in Nonwovens: A Growing Trend
Cotton is increasingly being used in nonwovens, a type of fabric made by bonding fibers together using chemical, mechanical, or heat treatments. Nonwovens are commonly used in disposable products like wipes, diapers, and medical dressings. Since nonwoven products are often single-use and end up in landfills, many manufacturers are looking for biodegradable alternatives. Cotton is a promising option for nonwovens, and its use is steadily growing. While cotton still makes up a small portion of the nonwoven market, its potential for replacing synthetic fibers in disposable products is significant. The USDA is also working on ways to improve the sustainability of cotton-based nonwovens.
The Economic Viability of Sustainable Cotton
While sustainability is important, economic viability is also a crucial factor in ensuring the long-term success of cotton farming. Transitioning to organic or regenerative farming practices often requires significant upfront investments in terms of time, labor, and resources. For many small cotton farmers, these practices may initially seem costly, but they can provide long-term benefits by improving soil health, increasing yields, and reducing the dependency on synthetic chemicals, which may become more expensive or regulated in the future.
To support this transition, policy initiatives and government incentives can play an important role. In some countries, subsidies or grants are available to farmers who implement sustainable farming practices, which can help offset the initial costs of transitioning to organic or regenerative cotton farming. Additionally, international certification programs, such as the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) or the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), can provide farmers with access to premium markets where sustainable cotton is in high demand, offering economic incentives for sustainable practices.
The Global Cotton Landscape and Future Outlook
Looking at the global cotton landscape, it’s clear that cotton farming will continue to evolve. While challenges like water consumption, pesticide use, and climate change impacts persist, there are promising developments that can help mitigate these challenges. The integration of sustainable cotton practices is not just a trend but a necessary shift to ensure that cotton remains a viable and environmentally friendly option in the face of growing concerns about synthetic fibers and their environmental impact.
Countries like India and China, the two largest cotton producers, are also exploring ways to make cotton farming more sustainable. Efforts to reduce pesticide use, enhance water management, and support smallholder farmers are underway. As cotton-producing regions across the world adopt more sustainable practices, the overall global impact of cotton farming will continue to improve.
The future of cotton lies in balancing its economic value with its environmental sustainability. Through continued innovation, improved farming practices, and a shift toward circular economies, cotton can continue to be a major player in the global textile industry while minimizing its environmental footprint. It’s clear that sustainable cotton is not just possible—it is an essential component of a more sustainable future for the textile industry.
Conclusion: Cotton’s Path Forward
The debate about cotton’s sustainability highlights the complexities of balancing environmental impact with practicality and economic viability. Despite challenges like water use, fertilizers, and pesticides, cotton remains a strong contender as a more sustainable option compared to non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton’s biodegradability, potential for organic farming, and adaptability to climate change through drought-resistant varieties make it a promising alternative. By optimizing farming practices and reducing reliance on harmful chemicals, cotton can continue to be a sustainable solution for industries looking to move away from synthetics.
In conclusion, the question of whether cotton is sustainable depends on how it is produced, processed, and disposed of. Cotton, with its natural biodegradability, offers clear advantages over synthetic fibers, particularly in terms of reducing microplastic pollution and promoting a circular economy. However, challenges such as water use, pesticide application, and fertilizer dependency need to be addressed to ensure cotton’s sustainability in the long run.
By adopting sustainable farming practices, leveraging technological innovations, and encouraging responsible consumption, cotton can meet the demand for eco-friendly materials while minimizing its environmental impact. The growing interest in organic and regenerative cotton farming, along with advancements in cotton recycling, suggests that the cotton industry has a bright future in terms of sustainability. Ultimately, the shift towards sustainable cotton is not just an industry-wide effort but also one that involves consumers, farmers, and policymakers working together toward a more sustainable and circular future.
Is Cotton the Sustainable Future? Discover Why It’s a Game-Changer
Cotton is a natural, biodegradable fiber that has been around for centuries, but with the rise of more eco-conscious industries looking for greener alternatives to synthetic fibers like polyester and nylon, the question of whether cotton is sustainable is being debated. Synthetics have gained popularity because they are durable and long-lasting, but cotton is still growing strong. In fact, the cotton industry is projected to grow from a market value of $43.96 billion in 2024 to $50.2 billion by 2029. The U.S. is a major player in the cotton industry, producing around 12 million bales of cotton each year. While cotton is mainly used for apparel and textiles, it’s also found in other industries, including cooking, soap-making, furniture, and cosmetics.
As concerns about sustainability and reducing carbon emissions rise, industries are moving away from non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton has a long history in the textile industry, with the first seed believed to have been planted in Florida in 1556. But, with the invention of materials like nylon, polyester, and spandex in the mid-20th century, synthetics became more popular. While synthetics are durable, they are now under scrutiny due to microplastic pollution and their reliance on petroleum. So, even though cotton is getting more attention as a sustainable option, its sustainability is still questioned, particularly regarding water use and the chemicals involved in farming. Despite these challenges, many industries are leaning into cotton as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to synthetics, especially to meet the demand of eco-conscious consumers.
The Cotton Controversy
One of the most cited concerns about cotton farming is how much water it uses. It’s often claimed that producing a single pair of jeans requires 20,000 liters of water—this number came from a 1999 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) report. However, this statistic was later debunked because no original source could be found, and updated studies have reported much lower estimates. For example, the UN Environment Program revised the estimate to 3,781 liters per kilogram of cotton, which is closer to the amount needed for a pair of jeans. But, the actual water consumption depends heavily on where the cotton is grown. In places like the southeastern U.S., cotton farms may only need around 234 liters of water per kilogram, while farms in the southwest use around 3,272 liters. The difference mostly comes down to whether the farm relies on rainwater or irrigation.
Biodegradability
One of cotton’s biggest selling points is its biodegradability. Unlike polyester, which takes 20 to 200 years to break down, cotton decomposes in just one to six months. Cotton also plays a role in addressing the growing microplastic pollution problem. In 2004, researchers discovered that synthetic fibers—especially from textiles—were accumulating in the oceans, contributing to microplastic pollution. These fibers are released when clothes are washed and can end up in the air, water, and even our food. While measures like special filters in washing machines and treatment plants are being used, it’s hard to prevent the release of these fibers entirely. Cotton is a better alternative since it doesn’t contribute to the microplastic issue as much, even though cotton fabrics can shed microfibers too. The difference is that cotton fibers break down much faster and don’t leave harmful plastic remnants.
Cotton’s biodegradability also means it can be composted instead of being sent to landfills. In a study by Cornell University, cotton fabric broke down 77% after just 90 days in compost, whereas synthetic materials barely degraded. Composting cotton also helps enrich the soil, which contributes to carbon sequestration, as it returns carbon to the earth instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. This is important because the vast majority of textiles—around 75%—end up in landfills, releasing harmful gases like methane, which is much more dangerous to the climate than carbon dioxide. Textiles made from synthetics, especially, also release hazardous chemicals into the soil.
The Impact of Drought on Cotton Plants
Some of the concerns about cotton’s sustainability revolve around its water needs, particularly as climate change leads to more frequent droughts. It’s estimated that 56% of the global cotton crop depends on rainwater, and many worry that this will lead to lower yields as droughts become more common. However, cotton plants are actually fairly drought-resistant. They can grow deep root systems, adapt their cells, and reduce their photosynthetic rate to survive. Research is also focusing on identifying drought-resistant cotton varieties, so farms can plant these hardier crops to maintain or even boost yields despite worsening drought conditions.
It’s also worth noting that cotton doesn’t require more water than other crops like wheat, maize, and rice. In the U.S., cotton farms use just 3.8% of all irrigated land, and about half of these farms rely solely on rainwater. Water usage varies depending on the farming practices used—methods like furrow irrigation are only 60% efficient, while sprinkler and drip irrigation are far more effective at using water. Optimizing irrigation systems can help cotton farms use less water, which is a priority for sustainable farming.
Fertilizers: How Bad Are They?
Fertilizers are another area of concern for cotton farming. According to the USDA, a large percentage of cotton farms use synthetic fertilizers—86% use nitrogen, 61% use phosphate, and 48% use potassium. Fertilizers are energy-intensive to produce, requiring fossil fuels that release carbon emissions. They also disrupt the soil’s natural balance, killing beneficial microbes that are essential for healthy farming in the long term. Overuse of fertilizers can also release nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.
One of the biggest contributors to cotton’s carbon footprint is the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which accounts for nearly half of the emissions related to cotton farming. However, some farms are trying to reduce their environmental impact by switching to natural fertilizers made from plant materials, animal by-products, and minerals. Though these alternatives are harder to implement and more expensive, they offer a way to make cotton farming more sustainable in the future.
Pesticides and Herbicides
Pesticides and herbicides are commonly used on cotton farms, but their environmental impact has been a point of concern. While outdated reports still claim that cotton uses 25% of all pesticides and insecticides globally, newer estimates show that cotton actually accounts for just 4.61% of pesticide use and 10.24% of insecticide use. Despite these lower figures, pesticides are still widely used in cotton farming. A 2019 USDA study found that 93% of U.S. cotton fields were treated with herbicides, and 53% were treated with insecticides. The problem with these chemicals is that they can pollute water sources and harm aquatic life, and they pose health risks to farmers and nearby communities.
However, alternatives to these chemicals do exist. Organic cotton farming has been on the rise, and this approach uses natural methods to manage pests and encourage healthy crops. Organic farming practices like crop rotation—alternating different crops to reduce pests—can help keep the soil healthy and reduce the need for chemicals. Although organic cotton farming can be more difficult and labor-intensive, it’s a promising alternative to conventional farming methods. In 2019, only 0.2% of U.S. cotton was grown organically, but this percentage is steadily increasing.
Organic Cotton Farming: A Sustainable Option
The growth of organic cotton farming is part of a broader movement toward more sustainable agricultural practices. Organic cotton farming avoids synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and instead uses natural methods like crop rotation, companion planting, and natural pesticides. While it’s more challenging, organic farming preserves biodiversity and reduces the environmental impact of cotton cultivation. However, organic cotton still represents a small portion of total cotton production, so its adoption needs to increase to make a significant difference.
Biodegradable Alternatives: Cotton vs. Jute and Flax
Because of cotton’s reputation for being water-intensive, some are turning to other biodegradable alternatives like jute and flax. Jute, made from the bark of the jute tree, is cheaper than cotton and biodegradable but has a rough texture and doesn’t hold up well when washed, which limits its use in textiles. Flax, also biodegradable, is softer than cotton but more expensive and labor-intensive to grow. Despite its environmental benefits, flax is seen as a luxury product, which makes it less accessible for mass production.
Cotton still holds the advantage due to its lower cost, durability, and versatility. In fact, recent research has even explored blending cotton with jute to create a fiber called “jutton,” which combines the benefits of both materials.
Improving Cotton’s Environmental Footprint
In addition to organic farming practices and drought-resistant varieties, the cotton industry has been exploring other ways to improve its environmental footprint. One important approach is the implementation of precision agriculture techniques, which use data-driven technologies to optimize water and nutrient use. These techniques involve the use of sensors, drones, and satellite imagery to monitor soil conditions, weather patterns, and crop health in real time. By accurately measuring the needs of the cotton plants, farmers can reduce waste, improve yield, and use fewer resources, which leads to a reduction in environmental impacts.
Furthermore, there is increasing interest in regenerative agriculture practices, which focus on restoring soil health and biodiversity. These methods go beyond organic farming by aiming to regenerate ecosystems, sequester carbon in the soil, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By emphasizing practices like cover cropping, agroforestry, and reduced tillage, regenerative agriculture can help cotton farms become carbon-negative, turning them into net carbon sinks rather than carbon emitters.
The role of cotton in the circular economy is another area of focus. The circular economy emphasizes reducing waste, reusing materials, and recycling products at the end of their lifecycle. For cotton, this could mean creating systems where cotton fibers are recycled from old textiles and reprocessed into new products, minimizing the need for virgin cotton and reducing the amount of textile waste that ends up in landfills. Several companies are already experimenting with cotton recycling technologies, and if scaled, this could significantly reduce the overall environmental impact of cotton textiles.
The Role of Innovation and Consumer Demand
Innovation also plays a crucial role in the future of cotton’s sustainability. New technologies in the textile industry, such as waterless dyeing techniques and the use of eco-friendly chemicals in fabric treatments, could reduce the environmental impact of cotton fabric processing. These innovations, paired with sustainable cotton farming practices, could help create a more sustainable cotton supply chain from farm to finished product.
Additionally, consumer demand for sustainable products has been a driving force behind these changes. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, brands are increasingly being pressured to adopt sustainable practices in their supply chains. Cotton producers who adopt organic or regenerative farming methods, and companies that use cotton-based materials in eco-friendly products, are benefiting from this shift in consumer preferences. As demand for sustainably sourced cotton grows, it creates a ripple effect across the industry, encouraging more farmers to adopt sustainable practices.
Cotton in Nonwovens: A Growing Trend
Cotton is increasingly being used in nonwovens, a type of fabric made by bonding fibers together using chemical, mechanical, or heat treatments. Nonwovens are commonly used in disposable products like wipes, diapers, and medical dressings. Since nonwoven products are often single-use and end up in landfills, many manufacturers are looking for biodegradable alternatives. Cotton is a promising option for nonwovens, and its use is steadily growing. While cotton still makes up a small portion of the nonwoven market, its potential for replacing synthetic fibers in disposable products is significant. The USDA is also working on ways to improve the sustainability of cotton-based nonwovens.
The Economic Viability of Sustainable Cotton
While sustainability is important, economic viability is also a crucial factor in ensuring the long-term success of cotton farming. Transitioning to organic or regenerative farming practices often requires significant upfront investments in terms of time, labor, and resources. For many small cotton farmers, these practices may initially seem costly, but they can provide long-term benefits by improving soil health, increasing yields, and reducing the dependency on synthetic chemicals, which may become more expensive or regulated in the future.
To support this transition, policy initiatives and government incentives can play an important role. In some countries, subsidies or grants are available to farmers who implement sustainable farming practices, which can help offset the initial costs of transitioning to organic or regenerative cotton farming. Additionally, international certification programs, such as the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) or the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), can provide farmers with access to premium markets where sustainable cotton is in high demand, offering economic incentives for sustainable practices.
The Global Cotton Landscape and Future Outlook
Looking at the global cotton landscape, it’s clear that cotton farming will continue to evolve. While challenges like water consumption, pesticide use, and climate change impacts persist, there are promising developments that can help mitigate these challenges. The integration of sustainable cotton practices is not just a trend but a necessary shift to ensure that cotton remains a viable and environmentally friendly option in the face of growing concerns about synthetic fibers and their environmental impact.
Countries like India and China, the two largest cotton producers, are also exploring ways to make cotton farming more sustainable. Efforts to reduce pesticide use, enhance water management, and support smallholder farmers are underway. As cotton-producing regions across the world adopt more sustainable practices, the overall global impact of cotton farming will continue to improve.
The future of cotton lies in balancing its economic value with its environmental sustainability. Through continued innovation, improved farming practices, and a shift toward circular economies, cotton can continue to be a major player in the global textile industry while minimizing its environmental footprint. It’s clear that sustainable cotton is not just possible—it is an essential component of a more sustainable future for the textile industry.
Conclusion: Cotton’s Path Forward
The debate about cotton’s sustainability highlights the complexities of balancing environmental impact with practicality and economic viability. Despite challenges like water use, fertilizers, and pesticides, cotton remains a strong contender as a more sustainable option compared to non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. Cotton’s biodegradability, potential for organic farming, and adaptability to climate change through drought-resistant varieties make it a promising alternative. By optimizing farming practices and reducing reliance on harmful chemicals, cotton can continue to be a sustainable solution for industries looking to move away from synthetics.
In conclusion, the question of whether cotton is sustainable depends on how it is produced, processed, and disposed of. Cotton, with its natural biodegradability, offers clear advantages over synthetic fibers, particularly in terms of reducing microplastic pollution and promoting a circular economy. However, challenges such as water use, pesticide application, and fertilizer dependency need to be addressed to ensure cotton’s sustainability in the long run.
By adopting sustainable farming practices, leveraging technological innovations, and encouraging responsible consumption, cotton can meet the demand for eco-friendly materials while minimizing its environmental impact. The growing interest in organic and regenerative cotton farming, along with advancements in cotton recycling, suggests that the cotton industry has a bright future in terms of sustainability. Ultimately, the shift towards sustainable cotton is not just an industry-wide effort but also one that involves consumers, farmers, and policymakers working together toward a more sustainable and circular future.
Cotton: Is it Sustainable?
Cotton is a naturally-growing biodegradable fiber, yet its true sustainability has come into question as industries seek more environmentally-friendly options over non-biodegradable synthetic fibers, such as polyester and nylon, particularly within disposable nonwovens. Though the use of synthetics has increased considerably due to their long-lasting and durable properties, the cotton industry continues to grow, with market value expected to increase from $43.96 billion in 2024 to $50.2 billion by 2029. The U.S. plays a major role in the global cotton industry, producing an average of 12.07 million bales in 2023, the fourth highest producer below China (27.35 million bales), India (25.4 bales), and Brazil (14.57 bales). Cotton farms in the U.S. are concentrated in southern states, with Texas alone producing around 40% of the nation’s supply. Though most U.S.-grown cotton is used in apparel and textiles, it is also used in other industries, including cooking, soap production, furniture, and cosmetics.
With growing concerns surrounding sustainability and reducing carbon emissions, industries are looking to phase out non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. In the past, cotton was a staple of the textile industry and has been harvested for centuries, with the first seed in the U.S. believed to have been planted in Florida in 1556. Despite cotton’s long history, synthetic material gained popularity in the mid-1900s after the invention of nylon, polyester, and spandex, though synthetics have become a concern due to microplastic contamination and petroleum reliance. With attention back on cotton, questions about its true sustainability persist given concerns for water consumption and the use of hazardous pesticides and fertilizers during farming. Despite these concerns, manufacturers in many industries, including apparel and disposables, are incorporating more cotton into their products to offer sustainable options that appeal to environmentally-conscious consumers.
The Cotton Controversy
Serious claims have been made regarding the sustainability of cotton. One widely cited statistic that shocked consumers is the claim that producing a single pair of jeans requires 20,000 liters of water due to the ‘water-intensive’ nature of cotton farming. This statistic originated from a 1999 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) report and was promoted through an infographic on the WWF’s website. Years later, the claim was debunked, as no source was found for this statistic and updated life cycle analyses reported much lower estimates that prompted the WWF to redact their statement. The UN Environment Program updated their estimate to only 3,781 liters per kilogram, roughly the amount of cotton lint used for a pair of jeans, but true water consumption is dependent on farm location. For instance, farms in the southeastern U.S. require roughly 234 liters of water per kilogram while farms in the southwest require roughly 3,272 liters per kilogram. The variations in these estimates primarily stem from differences in the reliance on rainfall versus irrigation for watering.
Biodegradability
One of the main appeals of cotton as an alternative to traditional synthetics is its biodegradability; it decomposes within 1 to 6 months, unlike polyester, which is classified as non-biodegradable and takes 20 to 200 years to break down. It was not until 2004 that researchers discovered the widespread accumulation of microplastics in the oceans stemming in part from synthetic textiles. Synthetic microfibers are released during the washing of clothing and are one of the most prevalent forms of microplastics in the environment, which are detrimental to the environment, humans, and aquatic life. These fibers are found in food, water, and even the air we breathe. Mitigative measures are being adopted, such as specialized filters in washing machines and water treatment plants, though the small size of synthetic fibers makes it impossible to completely prevent their release. Cotton provides a practical alternative to synthetics that can reduce the spread of microplastics. However, cotton fabrics actually shed more microfibers than synthetics, but the lifespan of these fibers are much shorter within water sources and they do not release harmful plastic remnants. In addition to their role in the microplastic epidemic, synthetic fibers are produced from petroleum products and petroleum-based chemicals, another compelling reason for industries to shift back to natural, biodegradable materials such as cotton.
Cotton can also be discarded through composting instead of landfilling. A study at Cornell University found that cotton fabric achieved 77% degradation after 90 days in a composting facility, while synthetic materials, unsurprisingly, showed minimal breakdown. One key advantage of composting is its ability to return carbon to the soil through decomposition rather than releasing it into the atmosphere. Decomposing cotton fabrics actually enrich the soil by adding valuable nutrients in the process. While it is not feasible nor advantageous to return this nutrient-rich compost directly to cotton farms, the process helps mitigate carbon emissions associated with disposal. The majority of textiles—75%—end up in landfills, where they contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, including methane, which is approximately 80 times more harmful to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. Textiles containing synthetics also release hazardous materials into the soil that can impact local ecosystems and exacerbate the microplastic epidemic.
Impact of Drought on Cotton Plants
Previous concerns about the true sustainability of cotton claimed to be due to the vast water requirements of cotton farming in combination with increasing drought conditions due to climate change. It is estimated that 56% of the global cotton area dependent on rainwater could face reduced yield, but others speculate that increased concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide may actually lead to higher yield, demonstrating some uncertainty about the future of cotton farming and yield. Regardless, cotton plants are actually drought resistant due to various physiological responses to drought stress, such as the ability to grow deep networks of roots, undergo cellular adaptations, and decrease photosynthetic rate. Research has also shown that different cotton plant genotypes vary in response to drought stress, prompting a focus on identifying hardier varieties. This creates an opportunity to strategically select drought-resistant plants, enabling farms to maintain or even increase yields as droughts become more frequent and severe due to climate change.
Pertaining to the claims that cotton is a ‘thirsty’ plant, cotton plants on average do not require more water than many other crops, including wheat, maize, and rice. In 2023, cotton farms accounted for only 3.8% of the total irrigated land in the U.S., representing a small fraction of the nation’s irrigated acreage. Cotton’s relatively low irrigated water footprint can be attributed to its heavy reliance on rainwater, with approximately half of all cotton farms relying entirely on rainfall as their sole water source. Total water usage on irrigated farms can vary significantly due to farming conditions and irrigation methods. Furrow irrigation, where water flows through farm-wide trenches, is only 60% efficient on average, in comparison to 95% for sprinklers and 97% for drip irrigation. The slope of the field can also have considerable impact on the watering efficiency, demonstrating that optimized fields can considerably reduce water consumption and should be a priority for farmers.
Fertilizer: How Bad is it?
The use of fertilizer is also widespread amongst cotton farms, as the USDA reported 86% of cotton fields were applied with synthetic nitrogen, 61% with phosphate, 48% with potassium, and 41% with sulfur. These fertilizers are notorious for a few reasons. First, the production of fertilizers is energy-intensive, requiring more fossil fuels and thus higher carbon emissions. Second, fertilizers disrupt the natural balance of soil, killing beneficial microbes and making it difficult for future cultivation. Third, fertilizers can increase emission of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide if overapplied. Carbon emissions from fertilizer production is another major concern. A lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions during cotton farming found that 1601 kg of carbon dioxide is emitted per metric ton of cotton lint and that the highest source of emission was due to the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer (46%), while only 19% of emission was due to diesel/electricity use for irrigation and farm equipment. However, some farms mitigate these concerns by using natural fertilizers, such as plant-derived materials, animal by-products, and mined minerals to mitigate the detrimental impacts of synthetic fertilizer. The use of natural fertilizers is more challenging than synthetic alternatives, which is why many farmers do not choose them as their first option. Given these factors, the reliance on synthetic fertilizers is a drawback of using cotton as a primary fiber, but adopting natural alternatives is a promising solution to ensure cotton remains a sustainable option in the long term.
Pesticides and Herbicides
Pesticides and herbicides pose another drawback to increasing cotton farming, though there has been some potential controversy and misleading claims pertaining to their current use. Some estimates that originated from an outdated 1995 report, yet still touted today, stated that nearly 25% of all pesticides and insecticides are used on cotton farms. The Transformers Foundation challenged this claim, reporting an updated estimate that cotton accounts for 4.61% of all pesticide use and 10.24% of all insecticide use. These statistics are based on sales data and may not accurately reflect actual usage in the field; true usage of these chemicals may be even lower.
Despite relatively low global usage, pesticides are widely used in cotton fields. A 2019 USDA study of fields across 13 states representing 96.7% of total U.S. cotton acreage, found that 93% of these fields were treated with herbicides and 53% with insecticides. This poses a challenge for scaling up cotton production to replace synthetic fibers. Why is the use of pesticides and herbicides a concern? These chemicals can cause significant environmental harm, contaminating local water sources from runoff and harming downstream aquatic life and even poisoning birds. Synthetic pesticides have also shown to cause adverse health effects for farmers as well as local residents. Much like the case of synthetic fertilizers, alternatives to pesticides and herbicides exist that still make cotton a sustainable option.
Organic Farming: Making the Switch
The concern for using synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides in cotton farms prompted an uptick in organic cotton farming, which instead uses non-chemical methods to deter pests and encourage growth. Though inherently more difficult, organic farming takes advantage of methods such as crop rotation, which disrupts pest food sources and lifecycles to reduce their spread. Given that most pests and diseases are specific to a food source or host, continuously alternating crop type deprives pests and can be an effective alternative. In dire cases where pests become a significant issue, organic farmers have the option to use natural pesticides approved by the USDA’s National Organic Program to ensure no major loss in yield. Organic cotton farming, practiced since the 1980s, offers significant benefits, including preserving biodiversity and reducing reliance on expensive, harmful chemicals. However, adoption remains limited; in 2019, only 0.2% of U.S. cotton production was classified as organic. Despite this, the adoption of organic cotton farming is steadily increasing.
Advantages Over Other Biodegradable Alternatives
Due to cotton’s inaccurate reputation of being water-intensive, many turn to other environmentally-friendly alternatives such as jute and flax. Jute is another inexpensive biodegradable fiber alternative derived from jute tree bark, but textile manufacturers are less likely to adopt jute alternatives due to its rough qualities and washability issues. Recent studies have explored the potential of blending cotton and jute to create an alternative fiber known as ‘jutton’. Research comparing jutton to traditional cotton in terms of strength, draping, and pilling revealed minimal differences, positioning jutton as a promising alternative to synthetic fibers. Flax (linen) is another biodegradable fiber, but it also comes with drawbacks. Its farming and production are more labor-intensive than cotton or jute, making flax considerably more expensive. The high cost, combined with its softness, categorizes flax as a luxury good that is economically inaccessible for many consumers.
Additionally, the production costs of flax often match or exceed its income potential, though farmers frequently practice ‘double cropping’ with buckwheat to help reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides. Flax is naturally pest-resistant, minimizing pesticide usage from the start. Flax farming also has significantly lower carbon emissions compared to cotton, with some estimates suggesting that cotton farming emits up to four times more carbon than flax. Though flax is an environmentally-friendly alternative to synthetic fibers, the farming difficulties and high cost make it less feasible than cotton.
Incorporating Cotton into Nonwovens
Nonwovens are made from fibers bonded either from chemical, mechanical, heat, or solvent treatments into a fabric, rather than through traditional weaving and are typically made of non-biodegradable synthetic fibers such as polyethylene. While cotton’s role in textiles is already well established, its recent integration into nonwovens highlights its potential to replace synthetic materials in a range of industries, from disposable products to medical applications. Nonwovens are incorporated into many products, including disposable wipes, filters, diapers, and medical dressings. Given its ubiquitous use in single-use products, much of this disposable nonwoven material ends up in landfills, therefore the long-term use of these materials is unsustainable. Many companies and manufacturers of single use and disposable products are in search of viable alternatives. The use of cotton and other biodegradable fibers in disposable nonwoven materials is steadily increasing. In North America, over five million tons of nonwovens were produced, with 70% derived from natural fibers such as hemp, cotton, flax, or wool. However, synthetic materials still made up an average of 56% of the total composite, and cotton accounted for only 7%. Despite its limited adoption, cotton is considered a critical focus for advancing sustainable nonwoven production. The USDA has recognized its potential and established dedicated research efforts, including the Cotton Fiber Bioscience & Utilization Research group in New Orleans. This team is developing innovative, sustainable methods for manufacturing cotton-based nonwovens, aiming to enhance their value while reducing reliance on petroleum-based materials.Takeaways
The debate surrounding cotton’s sustainability highlights the complex trade-offs between environmental impact, practicality, and economic viability. With mounting concerns about the unsustainability of non-biodegradable synthetic fibers—due to their contribution to microplastic pollution and persistence in landfills—adopting natural and sustainable alternatives has become crucial. Cotton, despite challenges such as water usage, fertilizer dependency, and pesticide application, offers compelling advantages over synthetics. Its biodegradability, combined with opportunities for farming optimization, positions it as a promising alternative fiber, particularly for single-use nonwoven products. It outcompetes other biodegradable fibers due to its lower costs and durable-yet-soft properties. Advancements in organic cotton farming, along with research into drought-resistant varieties, demonstrate cotton’s potential to adapt to looming challenges posed by climate change. By optimizing farm setup to better utilize water resources and reducing reliance on harmful fertilizers and pesticides, farms can further enhance its sustainability. While there is still room for improvement in its environmental footprint, cotton remains a sustainable solution for industries who want to phase out synthetics with biodegradable alternatives.Cotton: Is it Sustainable?
Cotton is a naturally-growing biodegradable fiber, yet its true sustainability has come into question as industries seek more environmentally-friendly options over non-biodegradable synthetic fibers, such as polyester and nylon, particularly within disposable nonwovens. Though the use of synthetics has increased considerably due to their long-lasting and durable properties, the cotton industry continues to grow, with market value expected to increase from $43.96 billion in 2024 to $50.2 billion by 2029. The U.S. plays a major role in the global cotton industry, producing an average of 12.07 million bales in 2023, the fourth highest producer below China (27.35 million bales), India (25.4 bales), and Brazil (14.57 bales). Cotton farms in the U.S. are concentrated in southern states, with Texas alone producing around 40% of the nation’s supply. Though most U.S.-grown cotton is used in apparel and textiles, it is also used in other industries, including cooking, soap production, furniture, and cosmetics.
With growing concerns surrounding sustainability and reducing carbon emissions, industries are looking to phase out non-biodegradable synthetic fibers. In the past, cotton was a staple of the textile industry and has been harvested for centuries, with the first seed in the U.S. believed to have been planted in Florida in 1556. Despite cotton’s long history, synthetic material gained popularity in the mid-1900s after the invention of nylon, polyester, and spandex, though synthetics have become a concern due to microplastic contamination and petroleum reliance. With attention back on cotton, questions about its true sustainability persist given concerns for water consumption and the use of hazardous pesticides and fertilizers during farming. Despite these concerns, manufacturers in many industries, including apparel and disposables, are incorporating more cotton into their products to offer sustainable options that appeal to environmentally-conscious consumers.
The Cotton Controversy
Serious claims have been made regarding the sustainability of cotton. One widely cited statistic that shocked consumers is the claim that producing a single pair of jeans requires 20,000 liters of water due to the ‘water-intensive’ nature of cotton farming. This statistic originated from a 1999 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) report and was promoted through an infographic on the WWF’s website. Years later, the claim was debunked, as no source was found for this statistic and updated life cycle analyses reported much lower estimates that prompted the WWF to redact their statement. The UN Environment Program updated their estimate to only 3,781 liters per kilogram, roughly the amount of cotton lint used for a pair of jeans, but true water consumption is dependent on farm location. For instance, farms in the southeastern U.S. require roughly 234 liters of water per kilogram while farms in the southwest require roughly 3,272 liters per kilogram. The variations in these estimates primarily stem from differences in the reliance on rainfall versus irrigation for watering.
Biodegradability
One of the main appeals of cotton as an alternative to traditional synthetics is its biodegradability; it decomposes within 1 to 6 months, unlike polyester, which is classified as non-biodegradable and takes 20 to 200 years to break down. It was not until 2004 that researchers discovered the widespread accumulation of microplastics in the oceans stemming in part from synthetic textiles. Synthetic microfibers are released during the washing of clothing and are one of the most prevalent forms of microplastics in the environment, which are detrimental to the environment, humans, and aquatic life. These fibers are found in food, water, and even the air we breathe. Mitigative measures are being adopted, such as specialized filters in washing machines and water treatment plants, though the small size of synthetic fibers makes it impossible to completely prevent their release. Cotton provides a practical alternative to synthetics that can reduce the spread of microplastics. However, cotton fabrics actually shed more microfibers than synthetics, but the lifespan of these fibers are much shorter within water sources and they do not release harmful plastic remnants. In addition to their role in the microplastic epidemic, synthetic fibers are produced from petroleum products and petroleum-based chemicals, another compelling reason for industries to shift back to natural, biodegradable materials such as cotton.
Cotton can also be discarded through composting instead of landfilling. A study at Cornell University found that cotton fabric achieved 77% degradation after 90 days in a composting facility, while synthetic materials, unsurprisingly, showed minimal breakdown. One key advantage of composting is its ability to return carbon to the soil through decomposition rather than releasing it into the atmosphere. Decomposing cotton fabrics actually enrich the soil by adding valuable nutrients in the process. While it is not feasible nor advantageous to return this nutrient-rich compost directly to cotton farms, the process helps mitigate carbon emissions associated with disposal. The majority of textiles—75%—end up in landfills, where they contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, including methane, which is approximately 80 times more harmful to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. Textiles containing synthetics also release hazardous materials into the soil that can impact local ecosystems and exacerbate the microplastic epidemic.
Impact of Drought on Cotton Plants
Previous concerns about the true sustainability of cotton claimed to be due to the vast water requirements of cotton farming in combination with increasing drought conditions due to climate change. It is estimated that 56% of the global cotton area dependent on rainwater could face reduced yield, but others speculate that increased concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide may actually lead to higher yield, demonstrating some uncertainty about the future of cotton farming and yield. Regardless, cotton plants are actually drought resistant due to various physiological responses to drought stress, such as the ability to grow deep networks of roots, undergo cellular adaptations, and decrease photosynthetic rate. Research has also shown that different cotton plant genotypes vary in response to drought stress, prompting a focus on identifying hardier varieties. This creates an opportunity to strategically select drought-resistant plants, enabling farms to maintain or even increase yields as droughts become more frequent and severe due to climate change.
Pertaining to the claims that cotton is a ‘thirsty’ plant, cotton plants on average do not require more water than many other crops, including wheat, maize, and rice. In 2023, cotton farms accounted for only 3.8% of the total irrigated land in the U.S., representing a small fraction of the nation’s irrigated acreage. Cotton’s relatively low irrigated water footprint can be attributed to its heavy reliance on rainwater, with approximately half of all cotton farms relying entirely on rainfall as their sole water source. Total water usage on irrigated farms can vary significantly due to farming conditions and irrigation methods. Furrow irrigation, where water flows through farm-wide trenches, is only 60% efficient on average, in comparison to 95% for sprinklers and 97% for drip irrigation. The slope of the field can also have considerable impact on the watering efficiency, demonstrating that optimized fields can considerably reduce water consumption and should be a priority for farmers.
Fertilizer: How Bad is it?
The use of fertilizer is also widespread amongst cotton farms, as the USDA reported 86% of cotton fields were applied with synthetic nitrogen, 61% with phosphate, 48% with potassium, and 41% with sulfur. These fertilizers are notorious for a few reasons. First, the production of fertilizers is energy-intensive, requiring more fossil fuels and thus higher carbon emissions. Second, fertilizers disrupt the natural balance of soil, killing beneficial microbes and making it difficult for future cultivation. Third, fertilizers can increase emission of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide if overapplied. Carbon emissions from fertilizer production is another major concern. A lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions during cotton farming found that 1601 kg of carbon dioxide is emitted per metric ton of cotton lint and that the highest source of emission was due to the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer (46%), while only 19% of emission was due to diesel/electricity use for irrigation and farm equipment. However, some farms mitigate these concerns by using natural fertilizers, such as plant-derived materials, animal by-products, and mined minerals to mitigate the detrimental impacts of synthetic fertilizer. The use of natural fertilizers is more challenging than synthetic alternatives, which is why many farmers do not choose them as their first option. Given these factors, the reliance on synthetic fertilizers is a drawback of using cotton as a primary fiber, but adopting natural alternatives is a promising solution to ensure cotton remains a sustainable option in the long term.
Pesticides and Herbicides
Pesticides and herbicides pose another drawback to increasing cotton farming, though there has been some potential controversy and misleading claims pertaining to their current use. Some estimates that originated from an outdated 1995 report, yet still touted today, stated that nearly 25% of all pesticides and insecticides are used on cotton farms. The Transformers Foundation challenged this claim, reporting an updated estimate that cotton accounts for 4.61% of all pesticide use and 10.24% of all insecticide use. These statistics are based on sales data and may not accurately reflect actual usage in the field; true usage of these chemicals may be even lower.
Despite relatively low global usage, pesticides are widely used in cotton fields. A 2019 USDA study of fields across 13 states representing 96.7% of total U.S. cotton acreage, found that 93% of these fields were treated with herbicides and 53% with insecticides. This poses a challenge for scaling up cotton production to replace synthetic fibers. Why is the use of pesticides and herbicides a concern? These chemicals can cause significant environmental harm, contaminating local water sources from runoff and harming downstream aquatic life and even poisoning birds. Synthetic pesticides have also shown to cause adverse health effects for farmers as well as local residents. Much like the case of synthetic fertilizers, alternatives to pesticides and herbicides exist that still make cotton a sustainable option.
Organic Farming: Making the Switch
The concern for using synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides in cotton farms prompted an uptick in organic cotton farming, which instead uses non-chemical methods to deter pests and encourage growth. Though inherently more difficult, organic farming takes advantage of methods such as crop rotation, which disrupts pest food sources and lifecycles to reduce their spread. Given that most pests and diseases are specific to a food source or host, continuously alternating crop type deprives pests and can be an effective alternative. In dire cases where pests become a significant issue, organic farmers have the option to use natural pesticides approved by the USDA’s National Organic Program to ensure no major loss in yield. Organic cotton farming, practiced since the 1980s, offers significant benefits, including preserving biodiversity and reducing reliance on expensive, harmful chemicals. However, adoption remains limited; in 2019, only 0.2% of U.S. cotton production was classified as organic. Despite this, the adoption of organic cotton farming is steadily increasing.
Advantages Over Other Biodegradable Alternatives
Due to cotton’s inaccurate reputation of being water-intensive, many turn to other environmentally-friendly alternatives such as jute and flax. Jute is another inexpensive biodegradable fiber alternative derived from jute tree bark, but textile manufacturers are less likely to adopt jute alternatives due to its rough qualities and washability issues. Recent studies have explored the potential of blending cotton and jute to create an alternative fiber known as ‘jutton’. Research comparing jutton to traditional cotton in terms of strength, draping, and pilling revealed minimal differences, positioning jutton as a promising alternative to synthetic fibers.
Flax (linen) is another biodegradable fiber, but it also comes with drawbacks. Its farming and production are more labor-intensive than cotton or jute, making flax considerably more expensive. The high cost, combined with its softness, categorizes flax as a luxury good that is economically inaccessible for many consumers. Additionally, the production costs of flax often match or exceed its income potential, though farmers frequently practice ‘double cropping’ with buckwheat to help reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides. Flax is naturally pest-resistant, minimizing pesticide usage from the start. Flax farming also has significantly lower carbon emissions compared to cotton, with some estimates suggesting that cotton farming emits up to four times more carbon than flax. Though flax is an environmentally-friendly alternative to synthetic fibers, the farming difficulties and high cost make it less feasible than cotton.
Incorporating Cotton into Nonwovens
Nonwovens are made from fibers bonded either from chemical, mechanical, heat, or solvent treatments into a fabric, rather than through traditional weaving and are typically made of non-biodegradable synthetic fibers such as polyethylene. While cotton’s role in textiles is already well established, its recent integration into nonwovens highlights its potential to replace synthetic materials in a range of industries, from disposable products to medical applications. Nonwovens are incorporated into many products, including disposable wipes, filters, diapers, and medical dressings. Given its ubiquitous use in single-use products, much of this disposable nonwoven material ends up in landfills, therefore the long-term use of these materials is unsustainable. Many companies and manufacturers of single use and disposable products are in search of viable alternatives.
The use of cotton and other biodegradable fibers in disposable nonwoven materials is steadily increasing. In North America, over five million tons of nonwovens were produced, with 70% derived from natural fibers such as hemp, cotton, flax, or wool. However, synthetic materials still made up an average of 56% of the total composite, and cotton accounted for only 7%. Despite its limited adoption, cotton is considered a critical focus for advancing sustainable nonwoven production. The USDA has recognized its potential and established dedicated research efforts, including the Cotton Fiber Bioscience & Utilization Research group in New Orleans. This team is developing innovative, sustainable methods for manufacturing cotton-based nonwovens, aiming to enhance their value while reducing reliance on petroleum-based materials.
Takeaways
The debate surrounding cotton’s sustainability highlights the complex trade-offs between environmental impact, practicality, and economic viability. With mounting concerns about the unsustainability of non-biodegradable synthetic fibers—due to their contribution to microplastic pollution and persistence in landfills—adopting natural and sustainable alternatives has become crucial. Cotton, despite challenges such as water usage, fertilizer dependency, and pesticide application, offers compelling advantages over synthetics. Its biodegradability, combined with opportunities for farming optimization, positions it as a promising alternative fiber, particularly for single-use nonwoven products. It outcompetes other biodegradable fibers due to its lower costs and durable-yet-soft properties.
Advancements in organic cotton farming, along with research into drought-resistant varieties, demonstrate cotton’s potential to adapt to looming challenges posed by climate change. By optimizing farm setup to better utilize water resources and reducing reliance on harmful fertilizers and pesticides, farms can further enhance its sustainability. While there is still room for improvement in its environmental footprint, cotton remains a sustainable solution for industries who want to phase out synthetics with biodegradable alternatives.
References
Bednarz, C., Ritchie, G., Hook, J., Yager, R., 2004. Cotton Crop Water Use and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conference.
Çelik, S., 2023. Assessing Drought Tolerance in a Large Number of Upland Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Different Irrigation Regimes at the Seedling Stage. Life 13, 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13102067
Daria, M., Krzysztof, L., Jakub, M., 2020. Characteristics of biodegradable textiles used in environmental engineering: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production 268, 122129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122129
European Environment Agency, 2024. Microplastics from textiles: towards a circular economy for textiles in Europe. URL https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/microplastics-from-textiles-towards-a#:~:text=Awareness%20is%20increasing%20about%20the,global%20marine%20environment%20each%20year. (accessed 11.19.24).
Geng, S., Gao, W., Li, S., Chen, Qin, Jiao, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Qu, Y., Chen, Quanjia, 2024. Rapidly mining candidate cotton drought resistance genes based on key indicators of drought resistance. BMC Plant Biol 24, 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04801-6
Grubinger, V., n.d. Sources of Nitrogen for Organic Farms. University of Vermont. URL https://www.uvm.edu/vtvegandberry/factsheets/organicN.html (accessed 11.21.24).
Hasan, S.T., Alam, M.M., Sabil, R.S., Bari, M.S., 2020. A complete comparison between JUTTON & COTTON-increase jute dependency instead of cotton. JTEFT 6. https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2020.06.00238
Hedayati, M., Brock, P.M., Nachimuthu, G., Schwenke, G., 2019. Farm-level strategies to reduce the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cotton production: An Australian perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 212, 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.190
Herculite, 2023. Complete Guide to Synthetic Fabrics. URL https://www.herculite.com/blog/the-history-of-synthetic-fabrics (accessed 11.21.24).
Ho, T.T.K., Tra, V.T., Le, T.H., Nguyen, N.-K.-Q., Tran, C.-S., Nguyen, P.-T., Vo, T.-D.-H., Thai, V.-N., Bui, X.-T., 2022. Compost to improve sustainable soil cultivation and crop productivity. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 6, 100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100211
International Cotton Advisory Committee, 2018. The Final Statement of the 77th Plenary Meeting. URL chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.icac.org/Content/EventDocuments/PdfFilesdacbf868_c86f_488e_b36f_1877d762ae7e/E_Final_Statement1.pdf (accessed 11.19.24).
Iowa State University, n.d. Flax. URL https://www.extension.iastate.edu/alternativeag/flax#:~:text=Yields%20of%20better%20flax%20varieties,of%20growing%20oats%20or%20soybeans. (accessed 11.19.24).
Jamir, M.R.M., Majid, M.S.A., Khasri, A., 2018. Natural lightweight hybrid composites for aircraft structural applications, in: Sustainable Composites for Aerospace Applications. Elsevier, pp. 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102131-6.00008-6
Juanga-Labayen, J.P., Labayen, I.V., Yuan, Q., 2022. A Review on Textile Recycling Practices and Challenges. Textiles 2, 174–188. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010010
Koussé, J.N.D., Ilboudo, S., Ouédraogo, J.C.R.P., Hunsmann, M., Ouédraogo, G.G., Ouédraogo, M., Kini, F.B., Ouédraogo, S., 2023. Self-reported health effects of pesticides among cotton farmers from the Central-West region in Burkina Faso. Toxicology Reports 11, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.09.011
Leal Filho, W., Perry, P., Heim, H., Dinis, M.A.P., Moda, H., Ebhuoma, E., Paço, A., 2022. An overview of the contribution of the textiles sector to climate change. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 973102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.973102
Li, L., Frey, M., Browning, K.J., 2010. Biodegradability Study on Cotton and Polyester Fabrics. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 5, 155892501000500406. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501000500406
Manteco, 2024. Biodegradability in Fashion. URL https://manteco.com/biodegradability-in-fashion-all-you-need-to-know/#:~:text=It’s%20not%20considered%20biodegradable%20because,on%20the%20environment%20it’s%20in. (accessed 11.4.24).
Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2011. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011
Mordor Intelligence, 2024. Cotton Market Size and Share Analysis. URL https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/cotton-market (accessed 11.18.24).
National Cotton Council of America, 2024a. Economics of Cotton. URL https://www.cotton.org/pubs/cottoncounts/fieldtofabric/economics.cfm (accessed 11.19.24).
National Cotton Council of America, 2024b. The Story of Cotton. URL https://www.cotton.org/pubs/cottoncounts/story/ (accessed 11.21.24).
National Wildlife Federation, n.d. Cotton and Pesticides. URL https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2006/Cotton-and-Pesticides (accessed 11.20.24).
Organic Trade Association, 2022. Get the facts about Organic Cotton. URL https://www.ota.com/get-facts-about-organic-cotton#_edn4 (accessed 11.18.24).
Radhakrishnan, S., 2017. Sustainable cotton production, in: Sustainable Fibres and Textiles. Elsevier, pp. 21–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102041-8.00002-0
Rodale Institute, 2024. Pest Management. URL https://rodaleinstitute.org/why-organic/organic-farming-practices/pest-management/#:~:text=The%20strategies,Photo%20by%20Thomas%20Wood. (accessed 11.18.24).
Stavropoulos, P., Mavroeidis, A., Papadopoulos, G., Roussis, I., Bilalis, D., Kakabouki, I., 2023. On the Path towards a “Greener” EU: A Mini Review on Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) as a Case Study. Plants 12, 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051102
Taghvaeian, S., 2017. Surface Irrigation Systems. URL https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/surface-irrigation-systems.html#:~:text=Surface%20Irrigation%20Efficiency,-Surface%20irrigation%20systems&text=The%20remaining%2040%20percent%20escapes,of%20cotton%20in%20Southern%20California (accessed 11.18.24).
Thompson, R.C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R.P., Davis, A., Rowland, S.J., John, A.W.G., McGonigle, D., Russell, A.E., 2004. Lost at Sea: Where Is All the Plastic? Science 304, 838–838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559
Transformers Foundation, 2021. Cotton: A Case Study in Misinformation. URL chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5efdeb17898fb81c1491fb04/t/61de9a24d5a36752adcbf737/1641978418846/CottonPaper_120122_TransformersFoundation_.pdf (accessed 11.18.24).
Ullah, A., Sun, H., Yang, X., Zhang, X., 2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12688
UN Environment Programme, 2018. Cleaning up couture: what’s in your jeans? URL https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/cleaning-couture-whats-your-jeans (accessed 11.20.24).
UN Environment Programme, n.d. What’s the deal with methane? URL https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/video/whats-deal-methane#:~:text=Due%20to%20its%20structure%2C%20methane,years%20after%20it%20is%20released.
United Nations, 2024. Greenwashing – the deceptive tactics behind environmental claims. Climate Action. URL https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/greenwashing#:~:text=By%20misleading%20the%20public%20to,the%20air%20and%20nearby%20waterways. (accessed 11.4.24).
US Environmental Protection Agency, 2020. What You Should Know About Microfiber Pollution. URL https://www.epa.gov/trash-free-waters/what-you-should-know-about-microfiber-pollution (accessed 11.18.24).
USDA, 2024a. Cotton Fiber Bioscience & Utilization Research. URL https://www.ars.usda.gov/southeast-area/new-orleans-la/southern-regional-research-center/cotton-fiber-bioscience-and-utilization-research/ (accessed 11.19.24).
USDA, 2024b. Improving the Sustainability and Value of Cotton’s Natural Fibers. URL https://tellus.ars.usda.gov/stories/articles/improving-sustainability-and-value-cottons-natural-fibers#:~:text=North%20American%20manufacturers%20created%20over,about%2056%25%20of%20the%20material (accessed 11.19.24).
USDA, 2024c. Production – Cotton. URL https://fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/2631000 (accessed 11.21.24).
USDA, 2023. 2023 Irrigation and Water Management Survey. URL chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Online_Resources/Farm_and_Ranch_Irrigation_Survey/iwms.pdf (accessed 11.20.24).
USDA, 2022. Cotton Sector at a Glance. URL https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/cotton-and-wool/cotton-sector-at-a-glance/#:~:text=U.S.%20cotton%20is%20grown%20predominantly,suited%20for%20that%20area’s%20climate. (accessed 11.21.24).
USDA, 2020. 2019 Agricultural Chemical Use Survey – Cotton. URL chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/2019_Field_Crops/chem-highlights-cotton-2019.pdf (accessed 11.18.24).
USGS, 2024. Droughts and Climate Change. URL https://www.usgs.gov/science/science-explorer/climate/droughts-and-climate-change (accessed 11.20.24).
Zambrano, M.C., Pawlak, J.J., Daystar, J., Ankeny, M., Cheng, J.J., Venditti, R.A., 2019. Microfibers generated from the laundering of cotton, rayon and polyester based fabrics and their aquatic biodegradation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 142, 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.062
Zhang, Z., Huang, J., Yao, Y., Peters, G., Macdonald, B., La Rosa, A.D., Wang, Z., Scherer, L., 2023. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00476-z
Related Articles
ExxonMobil’s Dirty Secret: How Big Oil is Fueling the Plastic Crisis
December 1, 2024
No Comments
Read More »